In total agreement with the views expressed. If any case similar to the one
filed by the FAC against President Trump was to find its way to the Kenyan
Courts, I see them ruling in a like manner as the American Court since that
is what a proper interpretation of Art. 35 of the Constitution and Sec. 5
of the Access to Information Act calls for.
On Wed, 16 Oct 2019, 09:04 Liz Orembo via kictanet, <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Listers,
>
> A very interesting read by Tevin Mwenda,
>
> Can social media accounts of public officials in Kenya be construed to be
> channels that can be used by the public to access information from their
> elected leaders and other public leaders regarding them?
>
> Are those public officials allowed to block someone from accessing them
> when they use the same channels to interact with citizens?
>
> Full article here: www.kictanet.or.ke/?p=40802
>
> —
>
> Best regards.
> Liz.
>
> PGP ID: 0x1F3488BF
> _______________________________________________
> kictanet mailing list
> [email protected]
> lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet
> Facebook: www.facebook.com/KICTANet/
>
> Unsubscribe or change your options at
> lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/fmwangangi1%40gmail.com
>
> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform
> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and
> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
>
> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors
> online that you follow in real life: respect people’s times and bandwidth,
> share knowledge, don’t flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do
> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
>
_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
